Welcome to Sign in | Join | Help
in
Home Forums Calendar Back to FOX23.com

Separation of Church and State?

Last post 08-14-2009, 2:00 PM by allisonck. 8 replies.
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  •  01-20-2009, 1:18 PM 3662894

    Separation of Church and State?

    I have spent the entire day watching the inauguration and quite frankly find myself deeply disturbed at how many time I have heard the name of God invoked and prayer initiated in a land that supposedly has separation of Church and State. As a non-religious individual I am deeply offended by the Christian majority's audacity at insinuating their religious proscriptions and practices into the most important State function in our country.
    The constitution does not say that this is allowed and those in the Congress who assume that the Framers of the Constitution meant that it is are unethically promoting their own religion. If the Framers intended allowances for certain religious practices in State ceremonies and practices, they would have stated so in the constitution. Since they did not, it is wrong to assume that they would look fondly on this practice of allowing religious influence in every aspect of our government.
    Remember this small fact, The last time that politics and religion mixed, people were burned at the stake simply because another person held a grudge against them. Remember the Spanish Inquisition? The Crusades? Or perhaps I need to remind them of the Kings and Emporers who once ruled the majority of the "Civilized" world. They were constantly at war (usually over a single city or a few miles of farmland) and nobody could challenge their orders because they were "ordained" by God to rule. Or when the Anglo-Catholic Church assumed pseudo-control over the majority of Europe and a sin was considered a crime. Just imagine getting imprisoned or executed for having sex with your girlfriend without first going before a priest and being married. (Goodbye nightclubs) Or being publicly flogged for not attending church on a Sunday. Look at the Middle East. Their religious beliefs have been ingrained for so long in their leadership that they are almost always at war somewhere in the region. (And remember that they STILL aloow public execution by stoning for adultery)
    The religious majority in this country preach constatly about Freedom of Religion, but they only mean it as long as it is Christianity. Athiests are shunned, Wiccans are called pagans or witches, we treat native-born muslims like enemies of the state, Mormons are slandered for their belief in miltiple marraiges, Satanists are automatically suspect because of the symbols they wear. The children of these religious parents are picked on, insulted and sometimes even physically harmed in public schools when they don't "Meet at the Pole" for prayer or when they won't attend Teens for Christ. 
    People have been irresponsible with their money, spending what they didn't have to spend on things they could have lived without. It has led to the worst economic situation in my generation. How many of them did it believing that God would help them through their hard time. (God is appearantly broke since he doesn't provide anything to keep his churches open, hence the need for tithes and offerings)
    It is time for our so-called "Enlightened" species to grow up and quit depending on the Holy Father to solve our problems. All children must quit depending on their parents at some time or another.
    If you are going to believe in something, believe in Humankind (at least there is proof that we exist.)
    Sorry to blow so long, but those of us who don't follow any religion have absolutely NO representation anywhere. At least ONE of us had to stand up and say our peice.
    One last fact. The Pilgrims came here trying to get away from the theocracy in England (Think about it)
  •  01-20-2009, 3:55 PM 3663068 in reply to 3662894

    Re: Separation of Church and State?

    cybersinner:
    I have spent the entire day watching the inauguration and quite frankly find myself deeply disturbed at how many time I have heard the name of God invoked and prayer initiated in a land that supposedly has separation of Church and State. As a non-religious individual I am deeply offended by the Christian majority's audacity at insinuating their religious proscriptions and practices into the most important State function in our country.

    The constitution does not say that this is allowed and those in the Congress who assume that the Framers of the Constitution meant that it is are unethically promoting their own religion. If the Framers intended allowances for certain religious practices in State ceremonies and practices, they would have stated so in the constitution. Since they did not, it is wrong to assume that they would look fondly on this practice of allowing religious influence in every aspect of our government.

    Our Constitution guaratees the freedom OF religion.  It says nothing about freedom FROM being exposed to religion. 


    cybersinner:

    Remember this small fact, The last time that politics and religion mixed, people were burned at the stake simply because another person held a grudge against them. Remember the Spanish Inquisition? The Crusades? Or perhaps I need to remind them of the Kings and Emporers who once ruled the majority of the "Civilized" world. They were constantly at war (usually over a single city or a few miles of farmland) and nobody could challenge their orders because they were "ordained" by God to rule. Or when the Anglo-Catholic Church assumed pseudo-control over the majority of Europe and a sin was considered a crime.


    I believe you are making an exaggerated comparison.  The Crusades and the Spanish Inquisition don't even fall in the same ballpark as mentioning God in ceremonies swearing in a President.

    cybersinner:

    Just imagine getting imprisoned or executed for having sex with your girlfriend without first going before a priest and being married. (Goodbye nightclubs) Or being publicly flogged for not attending church on a Sunday. Look at the Middle East. Their religious beliefs have been ingrained for so long in their leadership that they are almost always at war somewhere in the region. (And remember that they STILL aloow public execution by stoning for adultery)

    Again, you are exaggerating here.  No one gets executed for having sex with their girlfriend w/o being married, but you can go to jail and be charged with various crimes if you have sex with your girlfriend if she is under age.  This is the law of the land, currently, and is not tied to any religion at all.  There are consequences for behavior that goes beyond what the law says is legal.

    cybersinner:

    The religious majority in this country preach constatly about Freedom of Religion, but they only mean it as long as it is Christianity. Athiests are shunned, Wiccans are called pagans or witches, we treat native-born muslims like enemies of the state, Mormons are slandered for their belief in miltiple marraiges, Satanists are automatically suspect because of the symbols they wear. The children of these religious parents are picked on, insulted and sometimes even physically harmed in public schools when they don't "Meet at the Pole" for prayer or when they won't attend Teens for Christ. 

    Freedom of Religion includes the ability for each religion to believe what their faith teaches.  Christians may believe Wiccans are called pagans or witches.  Some Wiccans do call themselves witches, others may not.  Freedom of speech is another right that we have in America, and that includes the right to express personal thoughts, beliefs, and opinions that might be offensive to others.  For that matter, television and movie makers use that freedom of expression, regardless of who they may offend, to produce films that 20 yrs ago would have been considered to be filth, but by todays standards don't even cause the average viewer to blink twice.

    cybersinner:

    People have been irresponsible with their money, spending what they didn't have to spend on things they could have lived without. It has led to the worst economic situation in my generation. How many of them did it believing that God would help them through their hard time. (God is appearantly broke since he doesn't provide anything to keep his churches open, hence the need for tithes and offerings)

    Yes, people are and have been irresponsible with their money, but they cannot blame their own actions on God.  It seems in the times we currently live in that the notion of taking responsibility for one's own behavior and actions is no longer in vogue because blaming someone else is easier to do.  If Joey spends his money unwisely, then Joey will suffer the consequences.  Unfortunately, often times when we make unwise decisions, there will be other people who are tied to our lives who will also be dragged into such consequences.

    cybersinner:

    It is time for our so-called "Enlightened" species to grow up and quit depending on the Holy Father to solve our problems. All children must quit depending on their parents at some time or another.
    If you are going to believe in something, believe in Humankind (at least there is proof that we exist.)
    Sorry to blow so long, but those of us who don't follow any religion have absolutely NO representation anywhere. At least ONE of us had to stand up and say our peice.
    One last fact. The Pilgrims came here trying to get away from the theocracy in England (Think about it)

    Many people do depend on God, and many people don't depending on what the individual believes.  Those who do depend on God often times find comfort in their belief. I do agree with what you said about children eventually will have to stop being dependent on their parents. 

    As far as believing in humankind... what's not to believe in in that respect?  Yes, we exist, but beyond that many people find that it just isn't enough to only believe in humankind.

    Also, the Pilgrims came here not only to get away from the church of England, but they came here in order to be able to freely practice their own belief system.  Again.. freedom of religion...

    btw... do feel free to post and REPRESENT who you are.  Happy to have you in the groups.  :)

     


    jd4fox23
  •  01-20-2009, 4:56 PM 3663111 in reply to 3663068

    Re: Separation of Church and State?

    Thank you for using your mind in your answer to my post. My purpose behind this was to see if there were other people out there who were capable of true, independant thought unmired by "vogue" way of thinking, to borrow a term from your answer. It is nice to see that not everybody has become a zombie who just says what they are told based on the way they were raised.
    Thannk you for welcoming me to the forum. This is the first one I have posted on, so my entry may have been a little rough around the edges. If I offended you or anyone else, please believe that it was not my intent.
    I was just venting a little. My own problem with religious belief stems from a purely evidentiary standpoint. I wasted twenty years of my life studying various religions, trying to find the one that fit me and finally realized that my scientific nature precluded me from ever being capable of "Faith" or belief without proof.
    Oh, yeah, sorry for the exaggerations, but I tend to see things in the worst-case scenario viewpoint. A theocracy terrifies me in the fact that my family is non-religious and would be the first victims in such a society.
    Thanks again. :-)
  •  01-20-2009, 11:45 PM 3663382 in reply to 3663111

    Re: Separation of Church and State?

    cybersinner:
    Thank you for using your mind in your answer to my post. My purpose behind this was to see if there were other people out there who were capable of true, independant thought unmired by "vogue" way of thinking, to borrow a term from your answer. It is nice to see that not everybody has become a zombie who just says what they are told based on the way they were raised.

    You're welcome!  :)  Most people who know me would probably say that I'm definately not the zombie type who just says what they are told to say.

    cybersinner:

    Thannk you for welcoming me to the forum. This is the first one I have posted on, so my entry may have been a little rough around the edges. If I offended you or anyone else, please believe that it was not my intent. I was just venting a little.

    No problemo...  :)  I've been around forums for such a long time, there isn't much that gets me riled.  Most people just want to be heard, and venting is pretty much a normal thing when someone is talking about a topic they feel is important to them. Make yourself at home.  Enjoy.

    cybersinner:

     My own problem with religious belief stems from a purely evidentiary standpoint. I wasted twenty years of my life studying various religions, trying to find the one that fit me and finally realized that my scientific nature precluded me from ever being capable of "Faith" or belief without proof.

    It couldn't have been all that much of a waste because you were learning, changing, developing your own beliefs, and trying to make sense of everything you studied.  Nothing we learn is a waste, and everything we go through prepares us for something we will face in the future.  Also, don't count yourself out as far as "Faith" or belief without proof.  You'd be surprised where Faith can exist and you didn't even know it was there.  Did you know it takes faith to believe in science?

    cybersinner:

    Oh, yeah, sorry for the exaggerations, but I tend to see things in the worst-case scenario viewpoint. A theocracy terrifies me in the fact that my family is non-religious and would be the first victims in such a society.
    Thanks again. :-)

    I don't think very many people really want to live in a theocracy. I do believe, though, that people want to be free to live their lives how they see fit, and that includes the religious and non-religious and everyone in between.

     


    jd4fox23
  •  01-21-2009, 12:42 AM 3663422 in reply to 3662894

    Re: Separation of Church and State?

    All I can say is, "Good Thread"
  •  01-21-2009, 11:29 AM 3663907 in reply to 3663422

    Re: Separation of Church and State?

    i rarely get into a discussion about religion because most christians tend to judge or catagorize depending on what a person believes...something that a true christian is not supposed to do, but...well anyway...i wanted to answer this post because cybersinner wanted to know "if there were other people out there who were capable of true, independant thought" & yes we exist, but i usually remain silent where religion is concerned for the reason stated above...not out of fear but self-preservation...believe me, it is much easier that way...Smile
  •  01-21-2009, 2:02 PM 3664068 in reply to 3663907

    Re: Separation of Church and State?

    kioteemee:
    i rarely get into a discussion about religion because most christians tend to judge or catagorize depending on what a person believes...something that a true christian is not supposed to do, but...well anyway...i wanted to answer this post because cybersinner wanted to know "if there were other people out there who were capable of true, independant thought" & yes we exist, but i usually remain silent where religion is concerned for the reason stated above...not out of fear but self-preservation...believe me, it is much easier that way...Smile

    There are indeed those people, christians and non-christians alike, who find it difficult to talk about religion.  I figure the only way to get to know people is to talk to them about whatever topics they are interested in...  Our forums here tend to be a place where more people feel like they can say whats on their mind... within the normal restrictions of decorum that is imposed on a TV stations forum.  :)

    Jump in with both feet and make it a place you feel comfortable in speaking whats on your mind.

    Forum Admin


    jd4fox23
  •  01-21-2009, 11:29 PM 3664683 in reply to 3664068

    Re: Separation of Church and State?

    hi...ok & thank you...
  •  08-14-2009, 2:00 PM 4222702 in reply to 3664683

    Re: Separation of Church and State?

    wow  i don't know where to start that was awesome cybersinner i myself keep wondering on a daily basis if there are any "free thinkers" around usually the answer is no so like kioteemee i keep these thoughts in my head. i don't believe anyone should be judged on what they believe or don't believe. but our country as a whole obviosly thinks differently. every where i look there is religion oddly most of it i notice in our government which i thought there was seperation of church and state. guess i was wrong. i thought the same thing during the presidential inaugration,that there was a whole lot of prayer and god talk. my thoughts are people should be allowed to say believe what ever they want. but it should kept personal. at home or place of worship. but not in are government and schools. if u are going in the public eye.remember that the public consists of whole crap load of beliefs or religions. if u are going to include one you should have to include them all and well i don't think that is possible. so leave it at home or place of worship. just a thought.
View as RSS news feed in XML
NOTE: Defamatory, rude or vulgar statements and non-sanctioned advertising will not be tolerated and will be removed from the web site. The author will be blocked from using the site in the future.
Inergize Digital Media This site powered by Inergize Digital Media. The views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of this station.