Welcome to Sign in | Join | Help
in
Home Forums Photos Calendar Back to FOX23.com

Judge rules camera under 16 year olds skirt is perfectly fine with him!

Last post 05-03-2008, 4:23 PM by stormer171977. 21 replies.
Page 2 of 2 (22 items)   < Previous 1 2
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  •  03-17-2008, 8:19 AM 2768217 in reply to 2751392

    Re: Judge rules camera under 16 year olds skirt is perfectly fine with him!

    Holy cow, I leave to go camping for a week and the whole state goes to hell. LOL

     

    Alright.. if she's dressed like a hooker she and Momma need to be slapped. HOWEVER.... this doesn't give anyone the right to do ignorant things. Kids are stupid. They aren't mature mentally. THAT in mind tells you that the adult in the rest of us calls the shots. Put the camera down, *****.

     

    By the way, did anyone in the court room happen to hear any pumping noises??  Just asking!Stick out tongue

  •  03-17-2008, 8:23 AM 2768226 in reply to 2768217

    Re: Judge rules camera under 16 year olds skirt is perfectly fine with him!

    Tega:
    Holy cow, I leave to go camping for a week and the whole state goes to hell. LOL


    Well, well, well, now we know were the problems lies :-D :-D :-D

    http://www.weirdoklahoma.com/
  •  03-17-2008, 10:28 PM 2771446 in reply to 2764759

    Re: Judge rules camera under 16 year olds skirt is perfectly fine with him!

    patriot1947:
    stormer171977:
    yo patriot, the peeping law does define privacy to be in a shower or dressing room.  From what I understand, this was out in the opening.  However, I do agree with you.  He should have been fined or locked away.  I mean, this is a form of sexual harrassment.  I don't care how you look at it.  She could have been wearing a bikini, you take a pic and she doesn't like it, it's harrassment.
      Sure if she had been in a bikini or naked, maybe she should have expected some man to take a photo or at least stare, but this kid was just shopping, wearing a dress, and someone simply put a camera up her skirt and took a shot of her butt, if she wasn't a minor, I guess I wouldn't even take notice of it, but as far as I am concerned, if she was wearing a dress and not a pair of short shorts or a bikini, she WAS trying to hide her a**,  and obviously did not want to publicly display her private parts, or she would have been wearing a see through dress or something else transparent, she didn't provoke him in any way, or invite him to do this, lets just forget the harrassment, anyone who takes a photo of a minor childs a** is instantly in possession of child porn, and that IS a crime, period.

    I agree

  •  04-28-2008, 3:30 PM 2951683 in reply to 2771446

    Re: Judge rules camera under 16 year olds skirt is perfectly fine with him!

    While on another forum, I ran across the opinion poll on Judge Harris and his latest fiasco. I asked the question, "Was he the judge who thought it was alright for a pervert to take a picture up the skirt of a 16 year old?". One of Judge Harris' fanclub shot back with, "Judge Harris didn't say it was alright, he ruled on the letter of the law, Dullard".  I responded with, " I didn't know if he WAS the judge who ruled on that, but thanks for confirming that, MO-RON". Anyway, long story short, now we know the identity of  the judge  who supported this particular sexual deviants act. Thought that was kind of interesting.
  •  05-02-2008, 8:24 PM 2968590 in reply to 2951683

    Re: Judge rules camera under 16 year olds skirt is perfectly fine with him!

    I thought that judge had been in jail/prison while all this was going on.  I know he's not now.  Wow, what a slap in the arm he got.  Any other person would have went to prison and registered as a sex offender.
  •  05-02-2008, 9:19 PM 2968712 in reply to 2968590

    Re: Judge rules camera under 16 year olds skirt is perfectly fine with him!

    Yeah I guess if you are up there high enough that makes it ok to run around snapping shots of the hooo ha! Jerks.
  •  05-03-2008, 4:23 PM 2970070 in reply to 2968712

    Re: Judge rules camera under 16 year olds skirt is perfectly fine with him!

    And where's fox23 at?  Shouldn't this be the type of stuff they should expose?
Page 2 of 2 (22 items)   < Previous 1 2
View as RSS news feed in XML
NOTE: Defamatory, rude or vulgar statements and non-sanctioned advertising will not be tolerated and will be removed from the web site. The author will be blocked from using the site in the future.
Inergize Digital Media This site powered by Inergize Digital Media. The views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of this station.